• Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Search
Close
Home Resolve by DE

Full Stop No. 35/2025 (Family – Dispute)

Adv. Dilip Kumar by Adv. Dilip Kumar
December 29, 2025
in Resolve by DE
0
Full Stop No. 35/2025 (Family – Dispute)
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp

Dispute-Eater
Run & Managed by
Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust
Muzaffarpur.
Full Stop No. 35/2025
(Family – Dispute)

Date of Compromise- 07.12.2025
Court Case Details:
Name of the Court: – Principal Judge, Family Court Muzaffarpur, Bihar
Case No. Matrimonial Case No. 713/2025
Name of the Petitioner No. 01: –   xxxxxx Kumar @ xxxxxx  (Husband)
Name of the Petitioner No. 02: –   xxxxxx Kumari (Wife)

Address of the Husband– Mr. xxxxx Kumar @ xxxxxx aged about xx years S/o Mr. xxxxxxxx Kumar xxxxxx Village and Post xxxxxxx, PS- xxxxxxx, District-Muzaffarpur, Mob.- 7xx487xxxx.

Address of the Wife – Smt. xxxxxx Kumari about xx years W/o Mr. xxxxx Kumar @ xxxxxx D/o Shri xxxxxxx a Resident at Village – xxxxxx (xxxxx-Tola), Po – xxxxxx, Ps- xxxxx, District- Muzaffarpur, Bihar Mob- 9xx314xxx0

A joint meeting of both parties and their guardians was held at the office of “Dispute-Eater.” During this meeting, both parties mutually agreed to a one-time settlement. As per the agreement, the husband committed to paying a total sum of ₹8,61,000.00 as a full and final settlement.

It was decided that: –

  1. The said payment of ₹8,61,000.00 was made at the time of the first motion.

The first motion was filed on 10.10.2025. After recording their joint statement, the wife received a Demand Draft dated 09.10.2025 bearing NO. 951951 for ₹8,61,000.00 from the court.

Before filing the second motion petition, a final meeting was held at the office of “Dispute-Eater” to ensure that all issues were resolved. Both parties and their guardians were physically present. They firmly denied any possibility of reconciliation and reiterated their decision to separate. There is no possibility between the parties to reside together. In this manner, the dispute between the parties came to a Full-Stop.

For Dispute-Eater
Date- 07.12.2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
Previous Post

Full-Stop No. 34/2025 (Family Dispute)

Next Post

“मम्मी, क्या यही मेरे पापा हैं?”

Adv. Dilip Kumar

Adv. Dilip Kumar

Next Post
“मम्मी, क्या यही मेरे पापा हैं?”

“मम्मी, क्या यही मेरे पापा हैं?”

Discussion about this post

Cases Resolved by the DE

Full Stop No. 35/2025 (Family – Dispute)

Full Stop No. 35/2025 (Family – Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
December 29, 2025
0

Dispute-Eater Run & Managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust...

Full-Stop No. 34/2025 (Family Dispute)

Full-Stop No. 34/2025 (Family Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
December 29, 2025
0

Dispute-Eater Run & Managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust,...

Full-Stop No. 33/2025 (Family Dispute)

Full-Stop No. 33/2025 (Family Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
December 29, 2025
0

Dispute-Eater Run & Managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust,...

Load More

Latest Articles on DE

न्याय की लाश

न्याय की लाश

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
January 28, 2026
0

भारतीय न्यायिक व्यवस्था में “तारीख पर तारीख” को मात्र न्याय...

हर पति–पत्नी को डिस्प्यूट ईटर क्यों जानना चाहिए।

हर पति–पत्नी को डिस्प्यूट ईटर क्यों जानना चाहिए।

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
January 21, 2026
0

हिंदू परंपरा में विवाह को केवल सात फेरों की रस्म...

नारी शिक्षा के साथ क्यों कमजोर होती जा रही है विवाह संस्था?

नारी शिक्षा के साथ क्यों कमजोर होती जा रही है विवाह संस्था?

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
January 16, 2026
0

राहुल (काल्पनिक नाम) मेरे सामने बैठा था। उसकी आँखों में...

Judgement from the Court

संयुक्त वसीयत की स्थिति में वसीयत का प्रावधान केवल मृतक वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति तक ही सीमित होगा जीवित वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति पर प्रभावी नहीं होगा-  केरल उच्च न्यायालय।

संयुक्त वसीयत की स्थिति में वसीयत का प्रावधान केवल मृतक वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति तक ही सीमित होगा जीवित वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति पर प्रभावी नहीं होगा-  केरल उच्च न्यायालय।

January 7, 2023
बहू को है सास-ससुर के घर में रहने का अधिकार – सुप्रीम कोर्ट का ऐतिहासिक फैसला,  

बहू को है सास-ससुर के घर में रहने का अधिकार – सुप्रीम कोर्ट का ऐतिहासिक फैसला,  

September 19, 2022
नोटरी विवाह/तलाक दस्तावेजों को निष्पादित करने के लिए अधिकृत नहीं हैं: – MP HC

नोटरी विवाह/तलाक दस्तावेजों को निष्पादित करने के लिए अधिकृत नहीं हैं: – MP HC

November 24, 2021
Load More
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter Youtube Linkedin
© 2019-2022 – Dispute Eater

Run & Managed by – RAM YATAN SHARMA MEMORIAL TRUST®

made with love at Ambit Solutions (7488039982)
WhatsApp chat