• Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Search
Close
Home Resolve by DE

Full Stop No. 13/2019 (Property Dispute)

Adv. Dilip Kumar by Adv. Dilip Kumar
August 11, 2020
in Resolve by DE
0
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp

 

Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust
A Public Charitable Trust
Muzaffarpur

Full Stop No. 13/2019
(Property Dispute)

Court’s Case Details: –
Name of the Court: – Sub-Judge 15th Muzaffarpur
Title Suit No. 538/2003
Name of the Plaintiff: – Shri Ram Kumar Singh S/o  Late Vishwanath Singh, A Resident at Club Road Mithanpura, Near Pani Tanki Chowk. Po- Ramna Ps- Mithanpura District – Muzaffarpur Bihar
Name of the Defendants: – State of Bihar & others Po – GPO, Ps – Town, District – Muzaffarpur, Bihar & Others.

Full-Stop

31.08.2019: – This case had been pending between the Plaintiff and the several defendants since 2003. The Plaintiff in the case is a very respectable person in Muzaffarpur. In the year 2019, he handed over the case file to me and requested me to contest the Suit pending in the court of Sub-Judge -15th Muzaffarpur. I went through the brief of the suit and noticed that although there were several defendants in the suit, the main dispute existed between the Plaintiff and defendant No. 04. After a week I went to the residence of the Plaintiff and narrated him about formation and the aims and objectives of the Trust. He appreciated me after knowing the aims and objectives of the trust. I asked him a question about the possibility of the compromise. I also told him if the suit was compromised with the effort of the trust, the trust would be thankful to him. I remembered well that they had looked closely at me for a while and said try.

Now the second task of the trust was to contact the defendant no. 04 who has been residing at Patna.

The Trust, after taking an appointment with defendant no. 04, decided to meet him at Patna. Since the defendant No. 04 a very influential Person hence the Chairman, Secretary of the Trust along with other respectable persons of the society decided to go Patna to meet him. He also appreciated the Trust but told that the interference of the trust was not required. But after a few moments he told that he would call the plaintiff. The team of the trust returned to Muzaffarpur.

After the passage of a fortnight, the plaintiff made a phone call to the secretary of the trust and advised him to prepare a withdrawal Petition of the above-mentioned suit. The Trust is quite happy and grateful to the plaintiff and defendant 04. The 16 years old litigation between the parties has now come to a full-stop.

S/d
Dilip Kumar
(Secretary)

 

Adv. Dilip Kumar

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
Previous Post

Full Stop No. 12/2019 (Pre-Dispute Property Litigation)

Next Post

Full Stop No. 14/2019 (Pre-Litigative Property Dispute)

Adv. Dilip Kumar

Adv. Dilip Kumar

Next Post

Full Stop No. 14/2019 (Pre-Litigative Property Dispute)

Discussion about this post

Cases Resolved by the DE

Full-Stop No. 18/2025 (Family-Dispute)

Full-Stop No. 18/2025 (Family-Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
May 6, 2025
0

Dispute-Eater Run & managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust...

Full Stop No. 17/2025 (Property – Dispute)

Full Stop No. 17/2025 (Property – Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
April 11, 2025
0

Dispute-Eater Run and managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust...

Full-Stop No. 16/2025 (Family-Dispute)

Full-Stop No. 16/2025 (Family-Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
April 3, 2025
0

Dispute-Eater Run & managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust...

Load More

Latest Articles on DE

“बेटी से बहू तक की यात्रा”

“बेटी से बहू तक की यात्रा”

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
May 24, 2025
0

शादी के कुछ ही दोनों बाद विवाद हो गया। कारण...

कैमरे के फ़्लैश में धुंधले होते वैवाहिक संस्कार।

कैमरे के फ़्लैश में धुंधले होते वैवाहिक संस्कार।

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
April 21, 2025
0

"कैमरे के फ़्लैश में धुंधले होते वैवाहिक संस्कार" भारत में...

दाम्पत्य संबंध या तलाक, किधर जा रहे है आप।

दाम्पत्य संबंध या तलाक, किधर जा रहे है आप।

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
April 6, 2025
0

लिषा, एक सुंदर और बुद्धिमान लड़की, का जन्म मुजफ्फरपुर जिले...

Judgement from the Court

संयुक्त वसीयत की स्थिति में वसीयत का प्रावधान केवल मृतक वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति तक ही सीमित होगा जीवित वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति पर प्रभावी नहीं होगा-  केरल उच्च न्यायालय।

संयुक्त वसीयत की स्थिति में वसीयत का प्रावधान केवल मृतक वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति तक ही सीमित होगा जीवित वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति पर प्रभावी नहीं होगा-  केरल उच्च न्यायालय।

January 7, 2023
बहू को है सास-ससुर के घर में रहने का अधिकार – सुप्रीम कोर्ट का ऐतिहासिक फैसला,  

बहू को है सास-ससुर के घर में रहने का अधिकार – सुप्रीम कोर्ट का ऐतिहासिक फैसला,  

September 19, 2022
नोटरी विवाह/तलाक दस्तावेजों को निष्पादित करने के लिए अधिकृत नहीं हैं: – MP HC

नोटरी विवाह/तलाक दस्तावेजों को निष्पादित करने के लिए अधिकृत नहीं हैं: – MP HC

November 24, 2021
Load More
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter Youtube Linkedin
© 2019-2022 – Dispute Eater

Run & Managed by – RAM YATAN SHARMA MEMORIAL TRUST®

made with love at Ambit Solutions (7488039982)
WhatsApp chat