• Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Search
Close
Home Resolve by DE

Full Stop No. 21/2025 (Family – Dispute)

Adv. Dilip Kumar by Adv. Dilip Kumar
July 25, 2025
in Resolve by DE
0
Full Stop No. 21/2025 (Family – Dispute)
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp

Dispute-Eater
Run & Managed by
Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust
Muzaffarpur.
Full Stop No. 21/2025
(Family – Dispute)

Date of Compromise- 20.07.2025
Court Case Details:
Name of the Court: – Principal Judge, Family Court, Muzaffarpur, Bihar
Case No. Matrimonial Case No. 439/2025
Name of the Petitioner No. 01: –   xxxxx  Kumari (Wife)
Name of the Petitioner No. 02: –  xxxxx Raj  (Husband)

Address of the Wife – Mrs. xxxxx Kumari aged about 31 years W/o  Mr. xxxxx Raj D/o Mr. xxxxxxx Tiwari A Resident at:- xxxxxx Medicine Sadpura, PO – Ramna, Ps-Kazimohammadpur, District – Muzaffarpur, Pin- 842002, Mobile No.- 79xx661xx3

Address of the Husband– Mr. xxxxx Raj @ xxxxx Kumar aged about 33 years. S/o Mr. xxxxx Kumar Ranjan, A permanent resident at- xxxx Nagar, Khadi Bhandar Road Kanhauli, Po – Ramna, Ps- Mithanpura, District – Muzaffarpur, Pin- 842002, Mob No.- 9xx3370474.

The marriage between the parties was an ideal inter caste, duly consummated, and blessed with a daughter named Shreya Kumari. However, disputes arose between the spouses. Consequently, both parties agreed to seek a divorce by mutual consent.

A first motion petition under Matrimonial Case No. 510/2025 was filed and disposed of on 30.05.2025. A final opportunity for reconciliation was explored, but it failed.The parties have agreed to remain separated on the following terms:

  1. Custody of the Child:-Shreya Kumari shall reside with her mother at her own risk and responsibility.
  2. Visitation Rights:– The father shall have visitation rights to meet Shreya Kumari, subject to mutual convenience and prior consultation with Petitioner No. 01.
  3. Property Rights of the Child:– The dissolution of marriage shall not affect the legal or proprietary rights of Shreya Kumari in the property of her father.
  4. Recurring Deposit Account:– Father had opened a recurring deposit account (No. 4970027585) in the name of his wife at the Post Office. If the wife withdraws the amount for the education of Shreya Kumari, the father shall raise no objection.

In this manner, the dispute between the parties has now come to a full-Stop.

 

Signature of Dispute-Eater
Date- 20.07.2025

 

Adv. Dilip Kumar

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
Previous Post

Full Stop No. 20/2025 (Family – Dispute)

Next Post

Full Stop No. 22/2025 (Family – Dispute)

Adv. Dilip Kumar

Adv. Dilip Kumar

Next Post
Full Stop No. 22/2025 (Family – Dispute)

Full Stop No. 22/2025 (Family – Dispute)

Discussion about this post

Cases Resolved by the DE

Full Stop No. 22/2025 (Family – Dispute)

Full Stop No. 22/2025 (Family – Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
July 26, 2025
0

Dispute-Eater Run & Managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust...

Full Stop No. 21/2025 (Family – Dispute)

Full Stop No. 21/2025 (Family – Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
July 25, 2025
0

Dispute-Eater Run & Managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust...

Full Stop No. 20/2025 (Family – Dispute)

Full Stop No. 20/2025 (Family – Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
July 25, 2025
0

Dispute-Eater Run & Managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust...

Load More

Latest Articles on DE

जुदाई से एकता की ओर यात्रा।

जुदाई से एकता की ओर यात्रा।

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
July 26, 2025
0

हँसते हुए इस जोड़ी के चेहरे पर जो मुस्कान झलक...

Important Documents for Partition Suit.

Important Documents for Partition Suit.

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
June 7, 2025
0

Certified Copy of Survey Khatiyan. (Title deeds like Sale Deeds,...

“बेटी से बहू तक की यात्रा”

“बेटी से बहू तक की यात्रा”

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
May 24, 2025
0

शादी के कुछ ही दोनों बाद विवाद हो गया। कारण...

Judgement from the Court

संयुक्त वसीयत की स्थिति में वसीयत का प्रावधान केवल मृतक वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति तक ही सीमित होगा जीवित वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति पर प्रभावी नहीं होगा-  केरल उच्च न्यायालय।

संयुक्त वसीयत की स्थिति में वसीयत का प्रावधान केवल मृतक वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति तक ही सीमित होगा जीवित वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति पर प्रभावी नहीं होगा-  केरल उच्च न्यायालय।

January 7, 2023
बहू को है सास-ससुर के घर में रहने का अधिकार – सुप्रीम कोर्ट का ऐतिहासिक फैसला,  

बहू को है सास-ससुर के घर में रहने का अधिकार – सुप्रीम कोर्ट का ऐतिहासिक फैसला,  

September 19, 2022
नोटरी विवाह/तलाक दस्तावेजों को निष्पादित करने के लिए अधिकृत नहीं हैं: – MP HC

नोटरी विवाह/तलाक दस्तावेजों को निष्पादित करने के लिए अधिकृत नहीं हैं: – MP HC

November 24, 2021
Load More
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter Youtube Linkedin
© 2019-2022 – Dispute Eater

Run & Managed by – RAM YATAN SHARMA MEMORIAL TRUST®

made with love at Ambit Solutions (7488039982)
WhatsApp chat