• Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Search
Close
Home Resolve by DE

Full Stop No. 09/2026 (Property – Dispute)

Dispute-Eater Run and managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust Muzaffarpur, Bihar. Full Stop No. 09/2026 (Property – Dispute) Date of Compromise- 07.06.2026 Court Case Details: – Title Appeal No. 81/2018 Name of the Court: - ADJ 13th Nature of Dispute: – Property Dispute Name and full address of the First Party: –xxxxxx Thakur S/o Late xxxx Thakur a Resident at village and postxxxx , Ps-xxxx, District- Muzaffarpur Name and Full Address of the Second Party: – State of Bihar Full Stop No. 09/2026 A dispute existed between the appellant and the State of Bihar. For redressal of the grievance, the appellant had filed the aforesaid appeal before the competent court. Subsequently, the purpose for which the appeal had been filed was fulfilled, and the appeal became infructuous. Thereafter, a counselling session was conducted, during which the appellant agreed to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, a petition for withdrawal was prepared and duly filed before the concerned court. Thus, the dispute pending before the court since 2018 has been amicably resolved, and the appellant has agreed to withdraw the pending appeal. Signature of Dispute-Eater 07.06.2026

Adv. Dilip Kumar by Adv. Dilip Kumar
June 28, 2026
in Resolve by DE
0
Full Stop No. 09/2026 (Property – Dispute)
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp

Dispute-Eater
Run and managed by
Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust
Muzaffarpur, Bihar.
Full Stop No. 09/2026
(Property – Dispute)

 Date of Compromise- 07.06.2026
Court Case Details: – Title Appeal No. 81/2018

Name of the Court: – ADJ 13th
Muzaffarpur

Nature of Dispute: – Property Dispute

Name and full address of the First Party: –xxxxxx Thakur S/o Late xxxx Thakur a Resident at village and postxxxx , Ps-xxxx, District- Muzaffarpur

Name and Full Address of the Second Party: – State of Bihar

Full Stop No. 09/2026

A dispute existed between the appellant and the State of Bihar. For redressal of the grievance, the appellant had filed the aforesaid appeal before the competent court. Subsequently, the purpose for which the appeal had been filed was fulfilled, and the appeal became infructuous.

Thereafter, a counselling session was conducted, during which the appellant agreed to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, a petition for withdrawal was prepared and duly filed before the concerned court.

Thus, the dispute pending before the court since 2018 has been amicably resolved, and the appellant has agreed to withdraw the pending appeal.

Signature of Dispute-Eater
date- 07.06.2026

 

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
Previous Post

Full Stop No. 08/2026 (Property – Dispute)

Adv. Dilip Kumar

Adv. Dilip Kumar

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
guest
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Cases Resolved by the DE

Full Stop No. 09/2026 (Property – Dispute)

Full Stop No. 09/2026 (Property – Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
June 28, 2026
0

Dispute-Eater Run and managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust...

Full Stop No. 08/2026 (Property – Dispute)

Full Stop No. 08/2026 (Property – Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
June 28, 2026
0

Dispute-Eater Run and managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust...

Full Stop No. 07/2026 (Family – Dispute)

Full Stop No. 07/2026 (Family – Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
June 28, 2026
0

Dispute-Eater Run & Managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust...

Load More

Latest Articles on DE

Complaint केस में “जमानत” की जरूरत खत्म – सर्वोच्च न्यायालय।

Complaint केस में “जमानत” की जरूरत खत्म – सर्वोच्च न्यायालय।

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
May 11, 2026
0

परिवाद (Complaint Case) में अब “अग्रिम जमानत” की जरूरत नहीं...

न्यायिक सुधार की दिशा में एक सार्थक पहल।

न्यायिक सुधार की दिशा में एक सार्थक पहल।

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
March 12, 2026
0

न्यायिक सुधार की दिशा में एक सार्थक पहल।   भारत...

विवादों का धोबी: डिस्प्यूट-ईटर।

विवादों का धोबी: डिस्प्यूट-ईटर।

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
March 7, 2026
0

विवादों का धोबी: डिस्प्यूट-ईटर जहाँ झगड़े धुलते हैं और रिश्ते...

Judgement from the Court

संयुक्त वसीयत की स्थिति में वसीयत का प्रावधान केवल मृतक वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति तक ही सीमित होगा जीवित वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति पर प्रभावी नहीं होगा-  केरल उच्च न्यायालय।

संयुक्त वसीयत की स्थिति में वसीयत का प्रावधान केवल मृतक वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति तक ही सीमित होगा जीवित वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति पर प्रभावी नहीं होगा-  केरल उच्च न्यायालय।

January 7, 2023
बहू को है सास-ससुर के घर में रहने का अधिकार – सुप्रीम कोर्ट का ऐतिहासिक फैसला,  

बहू को है सास-ससुर के घर में रहने का अधिकार – सुप्रीम कोर्ट का ऐतिहासिक फैसला,  

September 19, 2022
नोटरी विवाह/तलाक दस्तावेजों को निष्पादित करने के लिए अधिकृत नहीं हैं: – MP HC

नोटरी विवाह/तलाक दस्तावेजों को निष्पादित करने के लिए अधिकृत नहीं हैं: – MP HC

November 24, 2021
Load More
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter Youtube Linkedin
© 2019-2022 – Dispute Eater

Run & Managed by – RAM YATAN SHARMA MEMORIAL TRUST®

made with love at Ambit Solutions (7488039982)
WhatsApp chat
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply