Dispute-Eater
Run & managed by
Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust
Muzaffarpur
Full-Stop No. 02/2025
(Property – Dispute)
Date of Compromise: – 26.02.2025
Name of the Court:- Mr. Raju Kumar Executive Magistrate East Muzaffarpur
Case No.- Proceeding U/S 147 Cr.P.C
Name of the 01st Party:- Mr. Bharat Thakur S/o Late Ragho Thakur, a Resident at village- Budhnagara, Ps- Mushahari, Sub-Division East Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur, Mob:- 9931274483
Name of the 02nd Party:- Mr. Ram Shobhit Thakur S/o Late Narayan Thakur, a Resident at village- Budhnagara, Ps- Mushahari, Sub-Division East Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur, Mob:- 9934008597
Both parties to the proceeding are residents of the same village. The dispute arose over the land situated in the village of Budhnagara, Police Station Mushahari, Sub-Division East Muzaffarpur, District Muzaffarpur. The land in question pertains to the Revisional Survey Khata Nos. 392, 322, and 393, with RSP Nos. 723, 724, and 729. The total area in dispute measures approximately 750 square feet, equivalent to 11.25 dismals (with dimensions of 03 feet wide and 250 feet long).
According to the first party, the land in dispute serves as a common passage, which they have been using for over 50 years. The first party claims that this passage is the only way to access the main road from their house. The second party has polluted the passage by discharging dirty water onto it. In addition, the second party is said to have encroached on the remaining portion of the land by erecting bamboo structures and a hut, thereby obstructing the use of the land as a common passage.
In response to these allegations, the second party filed a reply before the court of competent jurisdiction, seeking redress for the grievances. The second party appeared in court and vehemently denied the first party’s allegations. They contend that the land in question is their private property, which was allotted to them through a partition, and that they have every right to obstruct its use. The second party has therefore requested the court to dismiss the proceedings.
With the concerted efforts of the “Dispute-Eater,” the ongoing dispute between the parties has been successfully resolved. A formal compromise agreement has been prepared, which will be submitted to the court for approval. This agreement aims to permanently settle the dispute between the parties, ensuring that both sides are in agreement and all issues are conclusively addressed. As a result of this resolution, the conflict between the parties has now come to a Full-Stop.
For Dispute-Eater
26.02.2025
Discussion about this post