The bench observed that “once the mobile phone, which has been used in the commission of the offence, is registered in the name of the petitioner and the said number has been issued after the bio-metric verification of KYC of the petitioner, it is the petitioner, who has to explain as to how the said number was used in the commission of the offence.” The court also observed that the accused had not specifically denied that he was not using the said mobile number.
सम्पूर्ण judgement के लिए नीचे लिंक को click करें।
https://phhc.gov.in/enq_caseno.php?var1=CRM-M&var2=6558&var3=2020
