• Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Search
Close
Home Resolve by DE

Full Stop No. 14/2025 (Family – Dispute)

Adv. Dilip Kumar by Adv. Dilip Kumar
April 2, 2025
in Resolve by DE
0
Full Stop No. 14/2025 (Family – Dispute)
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp

Dispute-Eater
Run & Managed by
Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust
Muzaffarpur.
Full Stop No. 14/2025
(Family – Dispute)

Date of Compromise- 08.03.2025
Court Case Details:
Name of the Court: – Principal Judge, Family Court, Muzaffarpur, Bihar
Case No. Matrimonial Case No. 138/2025
Name of the Petitioner No. 01: –   XXXX Kumar  (Husband)
Name of the Petitioner No. 02: –   XXXXX Kumari (Wife)

Address of the Husband– Mr. XXXXX Kumar aged about 35 years S/o Mr. XXXX Sharma , #302. XXXXX Apartment 02nd B Main, OMBR Layout, Banaswadi, Bangalore, Karnataka, Pin – 560043, Mob- 9xxxxxxx.

Address of the Wife – Smt. xxxxxx Kumari about 30 years W/o Mr. xxxxx Kumar D/o Shri xxxxxx Kumar Singh a Resident at xxxxxxx, Po – xxxxxx, Ps- Dewaria, District- Muzaffarpur, Pin- 843120, , Bihar Mob- 9xxxxxxxx

On  19.01.2025, a joint meeting of both parties and their guardians was held at the office of “Dispute-Eater.” During this meeting, both parties mutually agreed to a one-time settlement. As per the agreement, the husband committed to paying a total sum of ₹10,00,000 as a full and final settlement.

It was decided that: –

  1. An initial payment of ₹2,00,000 would be made at the time of the first motion.
  2. The remaining ₹8,00,000 would be paid at the time of the final judgment.

The first motion was filed on February 17, 2025. After recording their joint statement, the wife received a cheque for ₹2,00,000 from the court.

Before filing the second motion petition, a final meeting was held at the office of “Dispute-Eater” to ensure that all issues were resolved. Both parties and their guardians were physically present. They firmly denied any possibility of reconciliation and reiterated their decision to separate.

During this meeting, the wife raised a concern regarding the return of her Stridhan. Since transporting all her belongings from Bangalore to Muzaffarpur was impractical, the value of her Stridhan was assessed at ₹3,00,000. To settle this issue, the husband agreed to pay an additional ₹3,00,000 at the time of the final judgment on the second motion petition.

Thus, the husband committed to paying a total amount of ₹11,00,000 at the time of the final judgment Through Demand Draft.

In this manner, the dispute between the parties came to a Full-Stop.

 

Signature for Dispute-Eater
Date- 08.03.2025

Adv. Dilip Kumar

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
Previous Post

Full-Stop No. 13/2025 (Property – Dispute)

Next Post

Full-Stop No. 15/2025 (Family-Dispute)

Adv. Dilip Kumar

Adv. Dilip Kumar

Next Post
Full-Stop No. 15/2025 (Family-Dispute)

Full-Stop No. 15/2025 (Family-Dispute)

Discussion about this post

Cases Resolved by the DE

Full-Stop No. 18/2025 (Family-Dispute)

Full-Stop No. 18/2025 (Family-Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
May 6, 2025
0

Dispute-Eater Run & managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust...

Full Stop No. 17/2025 (Property – Dispute)

Full Stop No. 17/2025 (Property – Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
April 11, 2025
0

Dispute-Eater Run and managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust...

Full-Stop No. 16/2025 (Family-Dispute)

Full-Stop No. 16/2025 (Family-Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
April 3, 2025
0

Dispute-Eater Run & managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust...

Load More

Latest Articles on DE

“बेटी से बहू तक की यात्रा”

“बेटी से बहू तक की यात्रा”

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
May 24, 2025
0

शादी के कुछ ही दोनों बाद विवाद हो गया। कारण...

कैमरे के फ़्लैश में धुंधले होते वैवाहिक संस्कार।

कैमरे के फ़्लैश में धुंधले होते वैवाहिक संस्कार।

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
April 21, 2025
0

"कैमरे के फ़्लैश में धुंधले होते वैवाहिक संस्कार" भारत में...

दाम्पत्य संबंध या तलाक, किधर जा रहे है आप।

दाम्पत्य संबंध या तलाक, किधर जा रहे है आप।

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
April 6, 2025
0

लिषा, एक सुंदर और बुद्धिमान लड़की, का जन्म मुजफ्फरपुर जिले...

Judgement from the Court

संयुक्त वसीयत की स्थिति में वसीयत का प्रावधान केवल मृतक वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति तक ही सीमित होगा जीवित वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति पर प्रभावी नहीं होगा-  केरल उच्च न्यायालय।

संयुक्त वसीयत की स्थिति में वसीयत का प्रावधान केवल मृतक वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति तक ही सीमित होगा जीवित वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति पर प्रभावी नहीं होगा-  केरल उच्च न्यायालय।

January 7, 2023
बहू को है सास-ससुर के घर में रहने का अधिकार – सुप्रीम कोर्ट का ऐतिहासिक फैसला,  

बहू को है सास-ससुर के घर में रहने का अधिकार – सुप्रीम कोर्ट का ऐतिहासिक फैसला,  

September 19, 2022
नोटरी विवाह/तलाक दस्तावेजों को निष्पादित करने के लिए अधिकृत नहीं हैं: – MP HC

नोटरी विवाह/तलाक दस्तावेजों को निष्पादित करने के लिए अधिकृत नहीं हैं: – MP HC

November 24, 2021
Load More
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter Youtube Linkedin
© 2019-2022 – Dispute Eater

Run & Managed by – RAM YATAN SHARMA MEMORIAL TRUST®

made with love at Ambit Solutions (7488039982)
WhatsApp chat