• Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Search
Close
Home Resolve by DE

Full Stop No. 11/2026 (Family – Dispute)

डिस्प्यूट - ईटर ने विवाद को वाद नहीं बनने दिया.

Adv. Dilip Kumar by Adv. Dilip Kumar
September 19, 2026
in Resolve by DE
0
Full Stop No. 11/2026 (Family – Dispute)
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp

Dispute-Eater
Run & Managed by
Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust
Muzaffarpur.
Full Stop No. 11/2026
(Family – Dispute)

Date of Compromise: 12.09.2026
Court Case Details:
Name of the Court: – Principal Judge, Family Court, Muzaffarpur, Bihar
Matrimonial Case No. 613/2026
Name of the Petitioner No.01: –xxxxx  (wife)
Name of the Petitioner No. 02: –xxxxx (Husband)

Address of the Husband– Mr. xxxxx  aged about xxx years, S/o Shri xxxxx Lal, R/o Mohallah-xxxxxxxx, P.O- G.P.O, P.S.- xxxxx, District- xxxxx, Jharkhand. PIN xxxxx Mobile No. xxxxxxxxx.

Address of the Wife Mrs. xxxxx aged about xx years W/o – Mr. xxxxx, D/o Shri xxxxxxx A Resident at Mohalla xxxxxxx P.O –  xxxxx P.S –xxxxxx Town Police Station, District –xxxxxxx, Pin- xxxxxx, Mobile No. xxxxxxxxxx

Background of the Parties

FULL-STOP

The parties to the dispute are husband and wife. Their marriage took place in xxxxxx. After the marriage, both parties went to xxxxxxxx, where differences arose between them, and they started living separately.

The guardians and family members of both parties made several efforts to resolve the dispute, but their efforts did not produce any fruitful result.

Ultimately, the matter came to the notice of Dispute-Eater. The husband first approached Dispute-Eater and discussed the matter. With the help of one of the advocates associated with Dispute-Eater, the wife was contacted and agreed to come to the office of Dispute-Eater.

Both parties appeared at the office of Dispute-Eater on 12.09.2026. A counselling session was conducted, and after a marathon counselling session, both parties agreed to resolve their dispute permanently.

Accordingly, a Settlement Agreement was prepared at the office of Dispute-Eater.

The main objective of Dispute-Eater is “विवाद को वाद नहीं बनने देना है,” to prevent a dispute from becoming a court case. In the present matter, this objective was achieved. With the efforts of Dispute-Eater, the dispute was resolved amicably without any intervention of the Court and before it could become a litigation.

Both parties have agreed to file a mutual consent divorce petition before the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Muzaffarpur, so that their matrimonial dispute may come to a permanent end. Thus, with the efforts of Dispute-Eater, the dispute between the parties has come to a FULL STOP.

 

 

For Dispute-Eater
Dated: 12.09.2026

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
Previous Post

Full Stop No. 10/2026 (Property – Dispute)

Adv. Dilip Kumar

Adv. Dilip Kumar

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
guest
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted

Cases Resolved by the DE

Full Stop No. 11/2026 (Family – Dispute)

Full Stop No. 11/2026 (Family – Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
September 19, 2026
0

Dispute-Eater Run & Managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust...

Full Stop No. 10/2026 (Property – Dispute)

Full Stop No. 10/2026 (Property – Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
July 30, 2026
0

Dispute-Eater Run and managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust...

Full Stop No. 09/2026 (Property – Dispute)

Full Stop No. 09/2026 (Property – Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
July 30, 2026
0

Dispute-Eater Run and managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust...

Load More

Latest Articles on DE

Complaint केस में “जमानत” की जरूरत खत्म – सर्वोच्च न्यायालय।

Complaint केस में “जमानत” की जरूरत खत्म – सर्वोच्च न्यायालय।

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
May 11, 2026
0

परिवाद (Complaint Case) में अब “अग्रिम जमानत” की जरूरत नहीं...

न्यायिक सुधार की दिशा में एक सार्थक पहल।

न्यायिक सुधार की दिशा में एक सार्थक पहल।

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
March 12, 2026
0

न्यायिक सुधार की दिशा में एक सार्थक पहल।   भारत...

विवादों का धोबी: डिस्प्यूट-ईटर।

विवादों का धोबी: डिस्प्यूट-ईटर।

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
March 7, 2026
0

विवादों का धोबी: डिस्प्यूट-ईटर जहाँ झगड़े धुलते हैं और रिश्ते...

Judgement from the Court

संयुक्त वसीयत की स्थिति में वसीयत का प्रावधान केवल मृतक वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति तक ही सीमित होगा जीवित वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति पर प्रभावी नहीं होगा-  केरल उच्च न्यायालय।

संयुक्त वसीयत की स्थिति में वसीयत का प्रावधान केवल मृतक वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति तक ही सीमित होगा जीवित वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति पर प्रभावी नहीं होगा-  केरल उच्च न्यायालय।

January 7, 2023
बहू को है सास-ससुर के घर में रहने का अधिकार – सुप्रीम कोर्ट का ऐतिहासिक फैसला,  

बहू को है सास-ससुर के घर में रहने का अधिकार – सुप्रीम कोर्ट का ऐतिहासिक फैसला,  

September 19, 2022
नोटरी विवाह/तलाक दस्तावेजों को निष्पादित करने के लिए अधिकृत नहीं हैं: – MP HC

नोटरी विवाह/तलाक दस्तावेजों को निष्पादित करने के लिए अधिकृत नहीं हैं: – MP HC

November 24, 2021
Load More
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter Youtube Linkedin
© 2019-2022 – Dispute Eater

Run & Managed by – RAM YATAN SHARMA MEMORIAL TRUST®

made with love at Ambit Solutions (7488039982)
WhatsApp chat
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply