• Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Search
Close
Home Resolve by DE

Full-Stop No. 28/2025 (Criminal Dispute)

Adv. Dilip Kumar by Adv. Dilip Kumar
September 10, 2025
in Resolve by DE
0
Full-Stop No. 28/2025 (Criminal Dispute)
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp

Dispute-Eater
Run & Managed by
Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust, Muzaffarpur
Full-Stop No. 28/2025
(Criminal Dispute)

Date of Compromise: 24.08.2025
Court Involved: Court No. 17, JM 1st Class (East), Muzaffarpur
Case Details
Complaint Case No. 776/2019
(Under Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act)
Parties
Complainant
Mr. Anil Kumar, S/o Late Parmeshwar Prasad Singh
Permanent Resident: Village – Rohua Rajaram, P.O. Mushahari Farm,
P.S. Mushahari, District Muzaffarpur, PIN – 842002
Mobile: 76xx84xx61
Accused
Mr. Vibhash Ratan, S/o Shri Dhrub Narayan Singh
Permanent Resident: Village – Rohua Rajaram, P.O. Mushahari Farm,
P.S. Mushahari, District Muzaffarpur, PIN – 842002
Mobile: 79xx34xx46
Background of the Dispute
Both parties belong to the same village. The complainant filed the above complaint case before the court, alleging that the accused had issued a cheque towards repayment of a legally enforceable debt. The said cheque was dishonoured by the payee bank due to insufficient balance. Despite receipt of due legal notice, the accused failed to make payment of the cheque amount. Consequently, the complainant instituted the present case.
When the matter came to the cognizance of the Dispute-Eater, both parties were called to the office on a scheduled date and time. A counselling session was held, during which the accused admitted his liability and agreed to pay the cheque amount within one and a half months. Accordingly, both parties agreed to file a compromise petition before the court.
Thus, the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved and has reached to a Full-Stop.

 

For Dispute-Eater
Dated: 24.08.2025

Adv. Dilip Kumar

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
Previous Post

महिला अधिकार : असली पीड़ित बनाम नकली पीड़ित।

Next Post

Full Stop No. 29/2025 (Family – Dispute)

Adv. Dilip Kumar

Adv. Dilip Kumar

Next Post
Full Stop No. 29/2025 (Family – Dispute)

Full Stop No. 29/2025 (Family – Dispute)

Discussion about this post

Cases Resolved by the DE

Full Stop No. 29/2025 (Family – Dispute)

Full Stop No. 29/2025 (Family – Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
September 10, 2025
0

Dispute-Eater Run & Managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust...

Full-Stop No. 28/2025 (Criminal Dispute)

Full-Stop No. 28/2025 (Criminal Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
September 10, 2025
0

Dispute-Eater Run & Managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust,...

Full-Stop No. 27/2025 (Family Dispute)

Full-Stop No. 27/2025 (Family Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
August 13, 2025
0

Dispute-Eater Run & Managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust,...

Load More

Latest Articles on DE

महिला अधिकार : असली पीड़ित बनाम नकली पीड़ित।

महिला अधिकार : असली पीड़ित बनाम नकली पीड़ित।

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
September 3, 2025
0

महिला अधिकार : असली पीड़ित बनाम नकली पीड़ित भारतीय समाज...

The Full Stop Theory of Justice

The Full Stop Theory of Justice

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
August 25, 2025
0

The Full Stop Theory of Justice All family disputes, property...

विवाद और विश्वास : एक दूसरे का विरोधी भी, सहयात्री भी।

विवाद और विश्वास : एक दूसरे का विरोधी भी, सहयात्री भी।

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
August 23, 2025
0

विवाद और विश्वास : एक दूसरे का विरोधी भी, सहयात्री...

Judgement from the Court

संयुक्त वसीयत की स्थिति में वसीयत का प्रावधान केवल मृतक वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति तक ही सीमित होगा जीवित वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति पर प्रभावी नहीं होगा-  केरल उच्च न्यायालय।

संयुक्त वसीयत की स्थिति में वसीयत का प्रावधान केवल मृतक वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति तक ही सीमित होगा जीवित वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति पर प्रभावी नहीं होगा-  केरल उच्च न्यायालय।

January 7, 2023
बहू को है सास-ससुर के घर में रहने का अधिकार – सुप्रीम कोर्ट का ऐतिहासिक फैसला,  

बहू को है सास-ससुर के घर में रहने का अधिकार – सुप्रीम कोर्ट का ऐतिहासिक फैसला,  

September 19, 2022
नोटरी विवाह/तलाक दस्तावेजों को निष्पादित करने के लिए अधिकृत नहीं हैं: – MP HC

नोटरी विवाह/तलाक दस्तावेजों को निष्पादित करने के लिए अधिकृत नहीं हैं: – MP HC

November 24, 2021
Load More
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter Youtube Linkedin
© 2019-2022 – Dispute Eater

Run & Managed by – RAM YATAN SHARMA MEMORIAL TRUST®

made with love at Ambit Solutions (7488039982)
WhatsApp chat