• Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Search
Close
Home Resolve by DE

Full Stop No. 05/2020 (Property-Dispute)

Adv. Dilip Kumar by Adv. Dilip Kumar
January 2, 2021
in Resolve by DE
0
Full Stop No. 05/2020 (Property-Dispute)
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp

 

Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust
A Public Charitable Trust
Muzaffarpur

Full Stop No. 05 of 2020
(Property-Dispute)

Court case details: –
Sub-Judge 09th Muzaffarpur
Eviction Suit No. 03/2016.
Name of the Plaintiff: – Shri Kameshwar Prasad Singh S/o Late Ram Bilochan Singh A resident at Juran Chapra Road No. 02, Po- GPO, Ps- Brahmpura, District- Muzaffarpur.
Name of the Defendant: – Dr Vinayak Gautam S/o- Shri Ram Kumar Singh A Resident at Club Road Mithanpura Ps- Mithanpura District – Muzaffarpur, Bihar

Full-Stop

19.03.2020:-That the plaintiffs are the landlords of the land situated at Mohalla- Juran Chapra, Road No. 02, PS- Brahmpura, District- Muzaffarpur, details about the same are as follows: –

Khata No. Khesra No. Area Holding No.
1 187

Ka

1 Katha & 5 Dhurs of land having a built-up area of approximately 6000 sq. feet including the ground floor, first floor, and second floor, excluding 150 sq. feet on the first floor on the east-south corner in which Om Jaanch Ghar is running. 700 (Old)

 

Boundary: –
North –         Ajay Kumar Sinha & others
South –         Dr. R.D Kumar
East   –         Juran Chapra Road No. 02
West  –         Shambhoo Prasad Singh

The plaintiffs had filed this suit against the defendant to vacate the suit premises on the ground of personal necessity and for arrears of rent. The matter came to the knowledge of the trust through learned advocate Shri Binay Kumar in the year 2017. The trust many times consulted with the defendant, but the defendant flatly refused to enter into the compromise. Lastly, the trust decided to meet learned advocate Mr Vijay Kumar Singh, who is an authorized advocate on behalf of the Defendant/tenant. With the help of him, the matter became settled outside the court. After the settlement, the plaintiffs’ have received the entire outstanding rent and has also taken possession of the suit premises from the defendant. In this way, the dispute between the parties has now come to a Full-Stop.

S/d
Dilip Kumar.
(Secretary)

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
Previous Post

Full Stop No. 04/2020 (Family Dispute)   

Next Post

विशेष विवाह अधिनियम 1954 की धारा 04 (c) और 15(d) विरोधाभाषी है।

Adv. Dilip Kumar

Adv. Dilip Kumar

Next Post
विशेष विवाह अधिनियम 1954 की धारा 04 (c) और 15(d) विरोधाभाषी है।

विशेष विवाह अधिनियम 1954 की धारा 04 (c) और 15(d) विरोधाभाषी है।

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
guest
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Cases Resolved by the DE

Full Stop No. 02/2026 (Family – Dispute)

Full Stop No. 02/2026 (Family – Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
January 31, 2026
0

Dispute-Eater Run & Managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust...

Full Stop No. 01/2026 (Family – Dispute)

Full Stop No. 01/2026 (Family – Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
January 31, 2026
0

Dispute-Eater Run & Managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust...

Full Stop No. 35/2025 (Family – Dispute)

Full Stop No. 35/2025 (Family – Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
December 29, 2025
0

Dispute-Eater Run & Managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust...

Load More

Latest Articles on DE

न्यायिक सुधार की दिशा में एक सार्थक पहल।

न्यायिक सुधार की दिशा में एक सार्थक पहल।

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
March 12, 2026
0

न्यायिक सुधार की दिशा में एक सार्थक पहल।   भारत...

विवादों का धोबी: डिस्प्यूट-ईटर।

विवादों का धोबी: डिस्प्यूट-ईटर।

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
March 7, 2026
0

विवादों का धोबी: डिस्प्यूट-ईटर जहाँ झगड़े धुलते हैं और रिश्ते...

“मेरे पास पैसा थोड़ा कम है।”

“मेरे पास पैसा थोड़ा कम है।”

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
February 14, 2026
0

भारतीय समाज में वैवाहिक विवादों को प्रायः “कानूनी समस्या” के...

Judgement from the Court

संयुक्त वसीयत की स्थिति में वसीयत का प्रावधान केवल मृतक वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति तक ही सीमित होगा जीवित वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति पर प्रभावी नहीं होगा-  केरल उच्च न्यायालय।

संयुक्त वसीयत की स्थिति में वसीयत का प्रावधान केवल मृतक वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति तक ही सीमित होगा जीवित वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति पर प्रभावी नहीं होगा-  केरल उच्च न्यायालय।

January 7, 2023
बहू को है सास-ससुर के घर में रहने का अधिकार – सुप्रीम कोर्ट का ऐतिहासिक फैसला,  

बहू को है सास-ससुर के घर में रहने का अधिकार – सुप्रीम कोर्ट का ऐतिहासिक फैसला,  

September 19, 2022
नोटरी विवाह/तलाक दस्तावेजों को निष्पादित करने के लिए अधिकृत नहीं हैं: – MP HC

नोटरी विवाह/तलाक दस्तावेजों को निष्पादित करने के लिए अधिकृत नहीं हैं: – MP HC

November 24, 2021
Load More
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter Youtube Linkedin
© 2019-2022 – Dispute Eater

Run & Managed by – RAM YATAN SHARMA MEMORIAL TRUST®

made with love at Ambit Solutions (7488039982)
WhatsApp chat
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply